|
Click here for the pdf version
Another
problem could be perception. A potential
market for robotic garages is high-rise apartments
and condominiums with built-in parking. However,
Denda said, the image of a mechanical parking
apparatus may not fit in with the image developers
want to convey: a personal touch of luxury
that high-end buyers
expect.
Haag said resistance to automated garages
is changing quickly. Over the past few months,
he said, he has finalized plans with developers
for five robotic garages - one each in Tampa,
Clearwater and Brooklyn, N.Y., and two in Fort
Lauderdale.
In Tampa, Colin Breen, owner of the Four Green
Fields tavern on the edge of downtown, bought
the robotic parking concept in conjunction
with the boutique hotel he plans to construct
adjoining the tavern. The space-saving aspects
of the garage convinced him because he has
limited land to provide parking for hotel guests.
Going robotic will allow him to construct a
garage that's about 6,000 square feet instead
of one that could be five times as big, he
said.
That means instead of building a hotel atop
a garage, as originally planned, the hotel
can be built with a more attractive design
at ground level because the robotic garage
can be along side the building, Breen said.
Hoboken's Experience
Haag said the success of the Hoboken garage
is what has finally convinced real estate developers
that his concept works. Using his patented
technology, Haag said, he has has built a better
mousetrap than his predecessors in Europe and
Japan. He said multiple elevators and backup
motors, computers and electrical generators
ensure the garage will always work.
However,
John Corea, executive director of the Hoboken
Parking Utility, said the garage
malfunctioned more than a dozen times last
winter as temperatures dropped and snow blanketed
the ground. Motorists were left waiting for
their cars up to 30 minutes in the best situations,
Corea said, and up to eight hours in the worst.
"I hate to throw robotic parking under a bus,"
Corea said, "but there are still some kinks
to be worked out."
Under normal conditions, the retrieval time
for a car is two to three minutes after a motorist
punches a four-digit code and swipes an identification
card, he said. The situation last winter was
most frustrating, Corea said, because he was
powerless to override the system while Haag's
technicians tried to figure out why the garage
wasn't working.
"In
a conventional garage, you can always manually
lift the gate if everything else fails,"
he said.
Haag disputes Corea's account, saying the
garage broke only twice last winter when sensors
that propel the elevators were affected by
the snow. New procedures put into place to
deal with severe weather will avoid future
problems at the Hoboken garage, he said.
One garage patron, Hoboken insurance agent
Roger Muller, said he has not had any problems
in the approximately six months he has used
the facility.
"At
first I was a little bit nervous about my
car getting damaged, but I have been very
satisfied with the garage," he said. "I used
to drive around for 45 minutes looking for
a space. It's worth the $200 a month to rent
a space." Muller said the most he has waited
for his car was five minutes.
Researcher Denda said robotic parking can
cost more to build than conventional parking:
$18,000 per space on average, compared with
$14,000 for nonautomated parking.
Denda said the cost differences lessen, though,
when other factors are taken into consideration,
such as the eventual deterioration of a parking
deck's concrete structure.
Haag said robotic parking will succeed because
it is a good thing, eliminating such annoyances
as walking around a garage searching for a
lost car.
"Progress
is determined by the increase in quality
of life overall," he said
|